As the old saying from Soviet Russia went, “New lies for old.”

If ever there was any doubt as to which side Barack Obama is on, this news should remove that doubt.  It is not the side of the United States of America.

A report today from Homeland Security Newswire says that British military sources have revealed two facts not widely publicized by the Lamestream News Media.  The first is that America’s recent campaign of military drone strikes has been quite successful against al-Qaeda cells in Pakistan.  The second fact is that the remaining terrorist leadership in Pakistan is now moving to North Africa.

Wait.  Didn’t we “liberate” countries in North Africa?

Precisely as The Crossbow predicted almost a year ago, the actions of Obama have actually helped al-Qaeda and its parent Muslim Brotherhood.

And, during that same time that he has been helping our enemies in the Middle East, Obama has been weakening domestic security in the United States by supporting the “Occupy” movement nationwide.  Again, this was predicted by The Crossbow several months before Occupy Wall Street first hit the streets of New York City.

When a person hurts American secuity at home, and simultaneously aids our enemies overseas, that is a double example of treason, which is punishable by death.  Yet, not only do none of the “leaders” of the Big Two political parties in either house of Congress say a word about this, but neither do the limp-wristed candidates of the Republican Party that hopes to somehow beat Obama in the November election.  (One must consider the question of whether doing nothing in the face of treason constitutes being an “accessory after the fact”.  Under the rules of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, which I used to help enforce, it does.  Every member of Congress — especially any that ever served in the military — should know that.)

Obama is playing some weird “shell game” with our Middle Eastern foreign policy.  He deployed our troops to oust a leader (Qaddafi, a former ally of the USA) that was cooperating with British Intelligence to keep al-Qaeda out of North Africa.  He was apparently doing this, in part, to attone for Libya’s 1988 plot that bombed Pam-Am Flight 103 out of the sky over Scotland, and/or for their part in the 1985 hijacking of the cruise ship Achille Lauro.  (After proof of Libyan involvement in that hijacking, President Reagan sent US Navy fighters across the so-called “line of death”, and they bombed Qaddafi’s desert camp.  One of his daughter’s died in the raid, but he did not.  No such raid took place under Bush-1 in punishment for the Flight 103 bombing.)

By continuing the war in Iraq, but then withdrawing our troops in time for a major Muslim holiday, and by campaigning for a troop withdrawal in Afghanistan, but then increasing the troop strength and combat missions there, and by reducing our support for ally Israel, while increasing support for terrorist organizations that border Israel, and then sending our troops on an unjustified and un-Constitutional combat mission to oust Qaddafi from Libya (and thus helping the Muslim Brotherhood to take control of North Africa), the current occupier of the Oval Office has not only committed treason, but he has also pissed on the graves of every American warrior that ever served in the Middle East.

So, why is he still there??  He belongs in the brig, awaiting trial for treason, instead of playing golf and shell games.