Barack Hussein Obama II, the purported “president”, has released his purported “birth certificate”. It’s about as genuine as Obama’s teleprompted speeches or his purported “auto”-biography (which has been thoroughly deconstructed). Yet, the Lamestream News Media is trying to say that the issue is now “settled”. In reality, the new document raises more questions than it answers.
Obama's purported "birth certificate" -- released by White House on 27 Apr 2011. (To view separately, right-click, then open in new window.)
Questions
- If the document released on 27 Apr 2011 is the “real” proof of Obama’s purported birth in Hawaii, then what does that say about the document that his campaign released during the 2008 campaign?
- If the document released on 27 Apr 2011 “now” settles the matter, then why did the Lamestream News Media say that the matter was settled by the previous document?
- (Several online writers have already asked this question by the time I could type this.) If all he needed to do was “say the word” to release this purported “long-form birth certificate”, then why did he not say the word before the 2008 election? And, why did he refuse to release this document last year, when it was demanded during the discovery phase of the court-martial of LTC Terry Lakin?
- After almost three years of public debate and lawsuits, didn’t Obama realize that the document shows his father as a Kenyan citizen — and, therefore, proves that Obama is not eligible for the Oval Office? (And, if he did not realize it, then what type of “Constitutional law professor” is he??)
The Document
Other writers have already published some analyses of the document, and have pointed out some substantial flaws. In a couple of areas, my analysis will build upon their work. The fact that the document fails scrutiny from so many angles proves that the “proof” is really no proof at all.
Karl Denninger, blogging in The Market Ticker, uses a technique that I cannot duplicate — because I have neither the software nor the level of experience that he displays. His post is titled “You’ve GOT to be Kidding Me“, and for ample reason. It is a must-read, because it obliterates any possibility that the document was not digitally pieced together. Thus, I will use his work as a starting point for the presentation of my own examination. (Click the link to see Denninger’s proof that the date stamp is a fake. For even further detail, he has also made a 10-minute video, in which he explains the importance of “chromatic aberration”. Double hat-tip to Andrea Shea-King, “The Radio Patriot“, for posting Denninger’s information.)
During my career in the Air Force, it was my privilege to have been trained by a variety of investigators — civilian police detectives, OSI agents, Secret Service agents, Customs agents, etc. So, although I’m a bit more technologically-savvy than NCIS Special Agent Leroy Jethro Gibbs, like him I usually prefer to rely upon good, old-fashioned logic and forensics. (And, that is usually good enough to catch most liars — including the current Liar-in-Chief.)
- Same stamp, with same blotch, in different offices?? Not likely! (For larger image, right-click, then open in new window.)
As the above graphic shows, the same digitally-inserted phony date stamp was inserted into the blanks for two different offices. One is a county-level office, and one is a state-level office. Therefore, it would’ve been impossible for the same stamp to be in two different locations. Apparently, the forger was not only careless, but also his carelessness was apparently caused by the haughty notion that those of us out here in “flyover country” are too stupid to notice such details. (That seems to be a recurring theme among Obamatrons.)
Such forensic evidence — which calls into question not only the authenticity of the document, but also the logical possibility that the document could be authentic — is especially convincing in a criminal trial for forgery. Given that this particular document was posted on an official Web page of the White House, and announced via an official news conference, then this particular felony falls under the “high crimes and misdemeanors” clause of the Constitution regarding impeachment. (The problem is that, if he was never really the president in the first place, then he cannot be “impeached”. However, he most certainly can be “removed”. The only question is whether Congress has the fortitude for the task, or will they — as is often the case — leave their dirty work for the military?) One of the attorneys for one of the several lawsuits against Obama regarding his eligibility, Mario Apuzzo, proved last year that Congress likely does not have the guts for the job. Apuzzo uncovered an official talking-points memo that shows members of Congress how to bamboozle their constituents on the question of eligibility. If they don’t have what it takes to even talk with voters about the topic, then how can they be expected to actually commit any action??
After my career in the Air Force, I worked as a paralegal in various law offices. During my paralegal training, I learned the “probative value” of a particular type of statement. It is called a “statement against interests”. Whenever a suspect or a witness makes a statement against his own interests, then that statement is considered to be true, because the person put himself at risk in order to bring the information to light. An example would be an inmate that said, “I could not have killed Billy in Cell Block 8, because I was sawing through the bars of Cell Block 27 at that time, and you can ask Big Guido, because he was there with me.” The inmate admitted to a different crime in order to protect himself from a greater crime. It was a statement “against his interests”, because he could’ve tried to say that he was in the kitchen baking a cake instead (and because Big Guido is gonna pummel him later!).
In the instant case of the purported “birth certificate”, Obama has made a statement against his own interests. The document states that his father, Barack Hussein Obama, was a citizen of Kenya at the time of “Junior’s” birth. By being a citizen of Kenya, the father was incapable of conveying “natural-born” American citizenship upon Baby Barack. Under another legal doctrine, “action proves intent”, we must accept the notion that the current occupier of the White House intended to tell the world that he is not eligible to live there. Not only did he release the document, but as a former “Constitutional law professor”, surely he must have known what would be the result of this information. And, because the action was also “against interests”, therefore we must accept that Obama Senior’s citizenship of Kenya must be true. Therefore, there is absolutely no way that Obama is eligible to sit in the Oval Office. And, there is absolutely no way that he did not know that. And, because of his background as a “Constitutional law professor”, there is absolutely no way that he did not know that prior to filling out the papers to apply to become a candidate for president. That, ladies and gentlemen, is admission of a felony — which was committed “with knowledge aforethought”.
But, wait, there’s more
Perhaps some of Obama’s defenders are thinking, “Well, maybe he knew that his father was a Kenyan citizen, but there is no way that Obama would be part of the conspiracy to commit such a massive fraud upon the American people. Right?“ Wrong!
By appearing in person at the news conference, and by personally commenting about the “certificate”, Barack Hussein Obama II has inserted himself into the web of conspiracy. And, the conspiracy to commit a felony is, itself, a felony — even if the planned misdeed is never consummated. Example: a group of Muslim terrorists are arrested with bomb-making materials and the blueprints of various churches and synagogues, after one of the conspirators has an attack of conscience and confesses to the police. The bombs were never placed at their targets. No matter. The suspects were still involved in a conspiracy to commit multiple felonies (assault, arson, murder). Therefore, the conspiracy itself is also a felony. The only way that Obama could extract himself from a charge of conspiracy would be to admit that he forged the “certificate” all by himself. It is highly unlikely that “The One” would take the fall for some “useful idiot” that is good with computer graphics. (Well … sorta good, but now “busted”. Keep reading.)
More proof that disproves the “proof”
Let’s get back to some old-fashioned forensics — the kind that would make Abby Sciuto proud. Denninger’s work showed that the “certificate” was the product of digital doctoring. My look at the date stamps shows that the forger was careless. But, there are several other points about the “certificate” that prove that the document proves nothing. (Except, of course, for the embedded statement against interests that legally renders Obama both ineligible for the Oval Office and simultaneously provides his confession of guilt for election fraud. Hmmmmmmm.)
Now, let’s build upon the work of another well-known Obama researcher, Dr. Jerome Corsi — author of The Obama Nation and the upcoming Where’s the Birth Certificate?, to be released in less than three weeks. Almost two years ago, Dr. Corsi obtained photostatic copies of the authentic birth certificates of twin girls that were born in the same hospital that Obama claims as his birthplace; and, those babies were born the day after of Obama’s purported birth there. So, the birth certificates should be identical in format. Right??
Interestingly, Corsi showed that the document number of Obama’s purported “certificate” is out of sequence with the known authentic certificates. Obama’s document number comes after, even though he was purportedly born before, those of the Nordyke twins. And, building upon his own previous work, Corsi showed earlier today that it was the state registrar, and not the individual hospitals, that assigned those document numbers in 1961. Therefore, it would be almost impossible for the numbers to be out of sequence with the chronological order of the births. But, wait, there’s more.
Building upon the investigation by Dr. Corsi, and applying old-fashioned forensics, let’s compare the document numbers themselves. Now that Corsi has proven that the numbers came from only one office — the state registrar — then the numbering format must be identical. That is because the numbers must have come from the same date stamper. Any differences must prove that one set of documents is not authentic. And, if it comes down to “either/or”, then the person with the greatest motive becomes the suspect. Remaining in the White House would be regarded by “any reasonable person” as a significant motive.
- Too many differences for these two documents to have been date-stamped by the same machine in the same office. (For larger view, right-click, then open in new window.)
As the above graphic shows, the actual document numbers on Obama’s purported “certificate” do not line up correctly. The digits, especially the middle “0″ and “6″, are at a different angle. It appears that each digit was placed individually by digital insertion, instead of all being stamped at the same time by a machine. (Relying upon Denninger’s electronic analysis, the final “1″ may have been on the original source document that was the foundation for this apparent forgery.)
We see that the document numbers are out of sequence. Even given that Obama’s purported birthdate (04 Aug 1961) was on a Friday, which means that both parent’s signatures were obtained the following Monday (that is possible), and thus it is possible that both original documents were received via regular mail by the state registrar on Tuesday, there is still a glaring irregularity.
Two brand-new mothers with the SAME handwriting??
As the above graphic shows, the chances of two brand-new mothers having nearly-identical handwriting — down to unique features, such as the odd angle of the hyphen and the elevated numeral — is almost impossible. That those two mothers would end up in the same hospital, far from their original homes, on the same weekend, makes the chances that much less. And, this staggeringly impossible feature of a document, coupled with the other impossible features, makes its forgery a virtual certainty. The only thing missing is a jury.
OOOOPS! Don't tell me that the State of Hawaii simply FORGOT that detail.
The problem of the fake “birth certificate” released yesterday is compounded by two other facts. The first is that the new one — ostensibly the most closely-examinded document in the world — has no official raised seal. The authentic document does. That is not the sort of thing that a trained and experienced document registrar would overlook, especially in these circumstances. But, it is the type of thing that some starry-eyed, Left-wing, college-age computer geek would overlook. And, that is exactly the type of Obamatron that could be easily thrown under the bus if this case ever goes to trial. Before our illustrious “leader” does one day in prison, he and his team of lawyers will make sure that the “useful idiot” geek does ten years.
Of course, there are still more anomalies that prove Obama’s document is a forgery. One could argue, illogically, that the same office in the same hospital had two different typewriters upon which to type birth certificates. However, even if that were true, then it still would not explain why the same character (a comma) looks three different ways on the same document. That is a clear forensic “tell” of a forged document. See the graphic below. (For a larger view, right-click, and then open in a new window.) This situation, of course, adds a whole new meaning to the joke about the “Obama comma“.
Same typewriter, but different commas, on the same document? No, not really. It's a bleepin' FORGERY!
And, of course, there is another detail or two that the State of Hawaii apparently “forgot”. The first is a thing called “compelling state interest”. First, the state (which is heavily controlled by the Democratic Party) said that no one — not even Obama himself — could obtain an official copy of the long-form certificate. (Well, if that were true, then how did Mrs. Nordyke get one?) Then, various officials claimed that they had seen it, but then they offered no proof. But, then, another official came forward and said that it does not exist at all, and that his superiors know that it does not exist. Well, since the first group of officials failed to provide proof that it does exist, and then another official made a spontaneous “statement against interests”, via affidavit, that it does not exist, the only one that meets the legal standard of proof is the statement that it does not exist. And, if it does not exist, then how did the State of Hawaii copy it??
And, if his “birth certificate” is a fake, then how did Obama get a driver’s license or register for the draft? Oh, well … no problem, because his draft registration was a fake, too. (If you don’t have time to read the entire three-part investigative column series, then you can listen to the three-minute explanation on talk-radio.) How is it that a man can presume to be the commander-in-chief after having a phony draft registration? Oh, duh! It’s because his mentor dodged the draft completely, and did so by writing an official letter that said he found himself, “loathing the military.”
Barack Hussein Obama II might sit in the single most powerful office in the United States, but he cannot be everywhere and do everything — even though he seems to think that he can. (Perhaps his followers, the Obamatrons, ascribe his “mystical powers” to the fact that his peculiar background qualifies him as The ‘Rosemary’s Baby’ of American politics!) So, unless he admits to lowering himself to sneaking into state offices at night to steal blank documents, making his own photocopies, and sitting at a computer for hours on end to doctor up a new “birth certificate”, then the only logical conclusion is that at least one other person was involved in this fraud upon the American people (and upon our courts). And, if another person was involved, then that is a conspiracy. And, with this much proof, then this is more than a mere “theory”.
——————————————————————–
side notes
- Yes, as a matter of fact, Senator Kerry and members of the Lamestream News Media, I did type this column while sitting in my pajamas.
- While at my last assignment in the Air Force, I got a little off-duty side job. I mowed the grass and pulled the weeds around a hangar on the civilian side of the airfield (it was a joint-service, joint-use location). It was not just any hangar. Only two people parked their airplanes there, and one of them was Donald Trump. I’ve never met the man. Now, via this column, I may have saved his bacon with regard to credibility. So, if you’d like to consider tipping the gardner, Mr. Trump, then you should consider putting my books into the bookstores in all of your hotels, casinos, etc. Thanks in advance.
- The only other person that kept his airplane in the hangar with Trump’s jet at that time was a person that actually did lose a lot of credibility: comedian Bill Cosby, who took up the phony cause of Tawana Brawley, but still got jobs on television after that. Cosby likes to tout himself as just a “regular guy” that truly understands the plight of impoverished Black people. And, for a hefty speaking fee, he used to fly in one of his two private Gulfstream jets to tell people so. Thus, when Cosby recently went on the TV news to whine that Trump had lost credibility, and that Trump was only picking on poor little Barack because he is Black (even though Obama is three times as White as he is Black), and that Trump should never get a job on television again, I really had to fight the urge to vomit. Cosby should stick to telling real jokes – because his recent appearance on the news was a rather tasteless joke.
- For those that attempt to decry my commentary as somehow “racist”, or hurl the crude epithet “birther“, you should know that I’ve been trying for eleven years to get a Black man elected to the White House. But, I don’t want a Communist living in the White House, regardless of race.
AIP News
Pingback: Laigle’s Forum » Blog Archive » Is the fake birth certificate REALLY my fault?
Only online for about four hours, and now getting about a hit per minute.
Very convincing evidence. The last item ( despite the rest of your discoveries )
to me was damning on what would actually be sent on a long form on the footer of the certificate from that state. The left wing loony’s have blinders on. They say we only attack him cause he’s black – they forget we chased John McCain based on similar issue of birth.
Hang in there
Joe
Houston, TX
(FYI: I posted in part some of your info here:
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/editorials/birth_of_notion_TdaWlqukVIezS0x5TvXV9K )
This is awesome Tom!! Not only the break-down of the “certificate” but the other legal implications our fearless leader might be in. If we only had gutsy
congressman, judges, and real popular conservative leaders that are not afraid of Obama.
I’m not convinced that BO II is not a natural born citizen due to his mother’s nationality and unwed status at the time he was born. BO was already married when he impregnated Ann Dunham and when he married her so the marriage to Ann was technically void. US Code Title 8 Chapter 12 SubChap 3 Part 1 SupPart 1409c clearly states that children born to unwed American Mothers acquire the nationality of their mother if born outside the United States.
I had no issue with Obama’s citizenship until he produced an edited copy of his BC. A few things stand out to me. the obvious edits in fields 17a, 20, and 22. The dates in 20 & 22 are obviously meant to create AUG – 8 1961 where the last ’1′ in field 20 is original and the 19 1 is original in 22. Why Ann’s occupation was edited I cannot say, but it was. Also the Local Registrar’s name seems to be U K Le Lee for BO II when the Nordyke’s was Peatrice L. Ygnain.
Lastly, may not mean anything, but Ann Dunham was impregnated by a black man in 1960 just weeks after she arrived in Hawaii. Not saying she was raped, the Dunhams seemed to really like the 25 year old man who got hold of their 17 year old. Perhaps BO II just didn’t want the world to know his 17 year old mom was so loose. Bottom line, he produced a edited copy of a BC. You don’t edit things that you want to be AUTHENTIC.
One more thing Hawaiian Law most certainly allows for vital statistic records to be copied and available. http://tinyurl.com/lc95ma
BO II, his wife, his lawyer, a court, and a host of gov’t agencies have a tangible and direct interest in obtaining his BC. The idea that it is ‘illegal’ to get hold of your own BC is complete BS. The idea that it could be illegal comes from some central planning socialist’s mind.
I am suspicious about this document, but would like to offer possible
explanations for some of the items:
The date stamp (which does look suspicious) could be the same for the local
registrar and state registrar in Hawaii. Since it is such a small state
and the state capital is Honolulu, it is conceivable that the same office acted
as the local registrar for Honolulu and the state registrar for the entire state.
The two mother’s date signings look identical. It is possible that the mothers only signed the form and a nurse filled in the date. In the same hospital the
same nurse may have done both. Conjecture on my part, but a possibllty.
Otherwise, this single item seems to be a slam dunk that it is fake.
Pingback: Could the President’s newly released COLB be a forgery? « A Nation ADrift-Why?
I’m flabbergasted at this intentional realease to cause further controversy.
I live in hawaii and i’m going to go down to where this was registared. and ask some questions just to let them know we are not robotons. Unless the people speak to this it will fade from memory as we watch America is moved forward into the transformation of internationalism.
AFIK there is NO requirement that both parents be citizens if one is born in U.S
decades ago, in Los Angeles, and maybe still true today, several hospitals had so many mothers from mexico that came to the U.S to give birth, they called it the Tijuana (sp) express. The reason was of course their child, being born in the U.S became a citizen.
And if I recall, in the late 1800′s , the issue of ‘natural born” was partially resolved by the SCOTUS after the civil war.
There is a difference between citizenship and the Constitutional requirement for the Office of the Presidency with regard to “natural born” citizenship status. For the Office of the Presidency one must have parents (plural) that are U.S. citizens. It further states that the birth mother must have lived continuously for 6 yrs. in the U.S. as an adult which would mean Ann Dunham would’ve needed to attain the age 24 yrs. by the time Obama was born. Neither of Obama’s parents were able to confer “natural born” status on their son.
I would also like to mention that people are forgetting the Kenyan Birth Certificate and the Kenyan Hospital Certificate of Live Birth issued for Baby Obama in 1961. These documents have been declared authentic. To believe this latest issue, one must believe the Kenyan’s mastered a huge conspiracy in the Hospital and Government offices against Baby Obama in 1961. It is more plausible that the desperate Koolaid embalmed kept to their usual deceitful habits. It is time for Obama/Liberals to get the message loud and clear that “We, the people” demand our Presidents respect our Republic, our Constitution, and our History as a People and Nation. This is not a laughing matter, nor should we take this lightly.
a further note. Although there is a signed affadavit by the temp elections worker in Hawaii- it contains or references NO evidence and would most likely be considered hearsay- and not admissible in any court. Unless he logged or wrote the details of his conversations at or almost immediately after any related discussion, the affadavit only shows his belief or recollection of events. That does not mean he is lieing or making a false statement, it simply means what he wrote is hearsay and has little or no standing in most legal forums.
Now if one could get a half dozen or so of the workers/supervisors/managers to testify to the same issue – nothing on record – then collectively it would carry some weight.
IMO – it is more likely that Obama was born in washington state, oregon, or idaho, under an assumed name of his mother, and a true certificate would show ‘ father unknown” or the equivalent. One must consider the culture and mores of that era regarding unwed mothers. IMO the one certain thing is that he was NOT born in Kenya. Which means technically, he IS a citizen.
Noone likes to be properly called a Bas***d
More than a thousand views so far, in less than 24 hours.
———————-
Chris, your points are well taken. Not only is the city named Honolulu, but the county is also Honolulu. So, that could add to the confusion. That is why I tried to stick mostly to the physical aspects of the document. (I also did not address the use of the term “African” versus the term “Negro”, because there is no way to go back and research what was the common practice in that specific place 50 years ago. At least, there is no way for ME to do it. Perhaps someone that gets paid can do it.)
———————-
Christopher, we DO have some principled and gutsy candidates. You can find them in America’s Independent Party. Click: http://www.AIPnews.com. I’ve been on the ballot for Congress twice. The last time, I got more than 49,000 votes, and only spent 3,000 dollars! The “powers that be” don’t like people like me.
———————-
EVERYONE: Don’t forget to use the “subscribe” feature on the top of the right sidebar. That way, you can also keep up with comments that other people leave after you. (And, don’t forget to FORWARD the link to all of your friends. This column is beginning to go viral, and the weekend is coming!)
Site traffic has now doubled again. Averaging one hit every 30 SECONDS!
Good Work Tom – I found the same inconsistencies and I’m not an expert at graphics at all. Zoom the document number. You’ll see the last number 1 stays intact while the others pixelate. The missing seal was stupid silly.
Great evidence, the sad thing is that you barely touched on half of the problems. The one that floored me is the PDF posted on the white house website, if opened in adobe Illustrator, you can see the hidden layers of the digital file. A bone head mistake by someone not familiar pdf output. Unfortunately not all of the layers are there. It does however completely prove the document was worked over. The other problems that I saw before I saw the layers were the inconsistent distortion in the doc. The base is a photo. As if it was shot while looking at a bound book. The typed text and the cross hatched background was added later. The typed text does not match the distortion of the paper at all. The spacing in the typed text is inconsistent. One thing you can count on with a typewriter. The cert. was obviously done by someone that has never used a mechanical typewriter. Maybe one of those Huff Post contributors. It’s a laughable excuse for a forged document.
Garrett, if you read paragraph #6 (starts with “Karl Denninger”), you will see that I actually begin my analysis by referring the reader to the very material that you descibed. I did not cover that material myself, because Denninger had already done so, and I do not take credit for other people’s work.
On the twins document the date stamp is the same for both boxes also. Also, just look at the document itself, it is suppose to be 50 years old, but it looks brand spanking new. Unlike the twins BC where you can see the age marks on the paper.
First of all you should examine the story being told about this document. They said it was only avail digitally from Hawaii. Then they said that they would make an exception for the pres and so he sent a lawyer to get two copies of it.
Why would you need to scan the copy in if it was already avail digitally? Why fly a lawyer when you could send it via email or even overnight delivery? And then if you do scan it in you would simply format it as a jpg and put it up online. You would not need to use ocr software as some have suggested as to the layers problem. The only way you use ocr is if you want to alter text. Why are you altering the document at all?
Another fact is that this document contains both pixel and vector info indicating that two different types of programs were used on it, like Photoshop and Illustrator.
The info contained in the document when viewed in Illustrator shows the actions taken on the various parts that were imported in to it. They show things like rotations and transparency added to the parts of it. As a matter of fact the actions palette recorded that they saved copies of the document as jpg, gif, and png files. So did someone upload the wrong copy? Intentionally?
One reader posted a comment on the Contact page, instead of this page.
I am pasting in his comment below. It’s a good one.
—————————————-
Mike Smith says:
Fri, 29 Apr 2011 at 2232 GMT (Edit)
One thing you left off in your very well written article. The first BC released from the Obama’s people said in the left hand bottom corner “FILED August 8, 1961″ and the new one says “ACCEPTED August 8, 1961″. This was a Friday, and if one department stamped it (local registrar) and then it had to go to the State office (and they mail these documents, they do not call a taxi and ship them all off to the State office) it would have been impossible for it to be accepted on the same date.
Mike,
I kept thinking about that in the back of my mind, but the column had already gone on pretty long, and I was too tired to do more research.
But, now that you’ve brought it up, let’s take it one step farther.
The time claimed for Obama’s birth on that Friday was >>> 7:24 PM <<<. Therefore, it would have been IMPOSSIBLE for any official form to have been “filed” OR “accepted” after normal business hours on a Friday.
Sir, you have just fired a torpedo into their engine room!
I kept looking at that time on the document, and subconsciously thinking that there was a clue there, but that aspect did not click on the day that I wrote the column.
THANK YOU, sir, for your very IMPORTANT comment.
There is no question about it, this PDF published by the Whitehouse is a doctored document. Question is; who is screwing this president so effectively and why did none of his loyal supporters prevent this?
Or is it a daring and intended distraction from other, more serious issues?
I am disturbed that we are being described as racist because we don’t wish to have a criminal usurper as the President of our great country! Did we not impeach Nixon for conspiracy? Last time I looked he was very much a white man. I am not going to endorse BO simply because of his skin color. There are many more black people out there who are more qualified and certainly more honest, trustworthy and intelligent! How convenient is it to drop that racism card when something isn’t going your way. You know what, can it… I don’t want to hear another word about racism. Women haven’t had such a cake walk either, but you know what, we plug away and we make progress and we don’t get to blame our failures on racism…. so just grow up!
If BO wasn’t born here and isn’t eligible for the Presidency, then he has to go bye bye. We must make an example of him or we are no better than every other country in this world that accepts a coup d`etat. If Kenya is his self professed home country, then what is all the argument. The man has confessed that he is NOT American, was NOT born in Hawaii! HIS OWN WORDS!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NqdChnj2i5w&feature=BFa&list=UL9rYGaqNRit
Follow that link and hear the man say it himself. Not American, Not born in Hawaii! He MUST be removed from the White House immediately. We can NOT let this idiot speak for Americans for one more minute!
Be careful what you cite as evidence. Some portions of that video (especially the portions from the town-hall meeting) have been edited to make it SEEM as though he had “confessed”. I watched that discussion live, and he did NOT say those words in that way. Whoever edited the video cut out the portions in which Obama made clear that he was speaking hypothetically.
I want him out of the Oval Office as quickly as possible, but not so fast that I would lower myself to his level by using lies to support my point.
There are several articulate, well-qualified Black men that I could support for president. The most qualified is Alan Keyes. But, I would certainly welcome an interview with Rep. Allen West (whom I’ve interviewed twice — once for a column, and once on my former talk-radio program; but, never as a candidate for president), or with Prof. Walter Williams, or with Herman Cain.
Everyone has heard the expression: FOLLOW THE MONEY. My expression is FOLLOW THE MOTHER .
We know this squatter’s mother was in the State of Washington hanging out where she spent her mid teens. On an island . She was accepted and physically relocated to the University of Washington. There is true data that she was also accepted in the University. There is plenty of factual data to support this.
And she went across the border to a socialist Nation specifically to Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada where she gave birth to this usurper in one of the free clinics run by the socialist government of Canada. She did NOT have to pay, she was able to remain annonymous.
I spent some time in Vancouver three years ago and looked at as many birth records as I could. Did not find what I was looking for BUT I covered only two hospitals.
FOLLOW THE MONEY but change it to FOLLOW THE MOTHER.
There is where he was born make no mistake about it. A Kenyan born in Canada. And why not. Wasn’t Kenya part of the British Empire at that time?
Check it out Born in Vancouver… follow the MOTHER find the baby.
Josh,
You do not need to post the same thing three times. I actually read the comments that people send me. Posting it three times only wastes your time and mine.
I have forwarded your comments to Dr. Jerome Corsi, full-time staff writer for WorldNetDaily. He is in a position to look into that information. I am not.
Best I’ve read Tom.
Most everywhere you look on this ‘document’… there is a problem. Besides the ‘cannot exist’ registrar number and date… We know from the FOIA released Documents from the Hawaiian DoH.. that in or about 1966 his BC was amended. We also know that in most all occasions such amendment is the result of adoption and subsequent name change.
That time frame correlates with his adoption by Lolo Soetoro… which would most likely entail a change in Nationality.
Here’s the problem… any time such amendment is made… the ‘new’ amendment is documented at the bottom of the original BC with dates, official stamps and witnesses. There are none on this BC.
So, this is not a currant rendition. I think this is for the most part… what he is hiding… the fact that he was adopted, name changed… And his Nationality changed to Indonesian… which clearly renders him ineligible to hold office… hands down, no arguments.
Tom, Note, though I used Corsi’s work product.. I posted the ‘cannot exist’ Registrar
number and date issue… a day earlier.
Proof it’s BunkPosted by Duke-Jinx on April 27, 2011 at 8:09pm
Note the registry number at the top… this one from 8-5-1961 is 10637… so how can zero’s… born a day earlier, 8-4-1961.. be 10641?
Here: http://www.patriotsheartnetwork.net/profiles/blogs/proof-its-bunk
Thanks for the compliment.
As I wrote in the 17th paragraph, Dr. Corsi wrote about the out-of-sequence document number two YEARS ago.
(I also came to the same conclusion on my own, having somehow missed that detail when I read his column at that time. But, in researching the details, I saw that Corsi was ahead of everybody. He is a meticulous researcher. Just ask John Kerry….)
Thanks Tom… though I thought the number was redacted on the first BC.. leaving no data for the correlation.
This might seem like “splitting hairs”, but the number was redacted on the “certification” (i.e.: the “short-form”), but not on the “certificate” (long-form). Perhaps it’s a moot point, because they are both phony, anyway.
Please also see website
http://alohareporter.com/2010/03/hawaii-considering-law-to-ignore-obama-birthers/
showing the document that hawai’i released to their own local newspaper last year, …..shows Obama was born in Kenya, with his Grandmother applying shortly after for a birth certificate. Per the law at the time, mother hadn’t lived in the US long enough to grant her child citizenship……
I looked at that document, and it appears to be a “red herring”.
Tom I believe that document is a forgery used by the left to help in their case to destroy Dr. Corsi’s credibility?
The so-called article is either an Internet Hoax or was used as part of the ploy of the Obama cronies to add credence to their claim that the so-called Birther’s are a bunch of wackos?
Pingback: Osama Dead For Years: PROVEN FACT! OBAMA INELIGIBLE TO SERVE! « Political Vel Craft
If any of you trust a black for any office in this country, you have your head in the sand
The only reason that I approved the above comment for posting is so that I can publicly state that it was a very pin-headed remark.
Unlike the vast majority of Obama supporters (and a very small percentage of Obama detractors), I do not consider one’s race to be a deciding factor in how I vote.
Alan Keyes is much smarter than almost anyone that I’ve ever met, and I have met a lot of very smart people. (I passed the Mensa entrance exam twice — once each in two different states — but never joined. That organization seems to be almost totally Leftist in its ideology.)
Dear Mr. Kovach,
Hello,let me say that this is my 1st time on your web site. My impression of what you are trying to do is that you are trying to serve your country as a God would have us to do according to His word. Please keep up the fight.
I am retired and living on a very SMALL income. The cost of living is getting to be out of sight and I may soon be forced to go back to work just to be able to eat.
I would like to say that 1st of all I am a God-fearing, God-loving Christian. And that secondly I am a country-loving American. I too served in the military and while never in combat, am proud of my 6 years in the Army Reserve, and also in my 12 years as a Federal Employee.
As for the current President of the United States, I have come to believe he is a complete fraud and is the Liar’s Liar in the biggest poker game ever played.
The greatest threat to our National Sovereignty, Security and Independence is Barry Soetoro, aka Barack Hussein Obama II, aka Harrison J. Bounel, aka Bounel J. Harrison, aka who knows? Not only are we looking at fake birth certificates and fraudulent Social Security Cards, we are now seeing them trying to release his college records (again these will need to be closely examined and verified as the real deal) to “try and prove his lies”.
May I offer a suggestion? Let’s get behind a Republican or Tea Party Black American (i.e. Herman Cain). Let’s get him elected along with a cuacasion female, then let the new Administration open a Federal Investigation into the crimes of Barack H. Obama and all of his aliases and his criminal supporters!
What do you think? Otherwise the liberals will be killing blacks in the streets and saying it is because of the conservative right.
Second, I will state for all to see that I am a God-fearing, God-loving
Pingback: Breaking => Concerted Effort By Democrats To Eliminate Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 Of The U.S. Constitution Just Prior To Obama’s Election: Presidents To Be Natural Born Citizens! « Political Vel Craft
look up “kerning on obama birth cert” you will see the light.
shawn,
I have looked up “kerning”, and I have seen the light.
That is why I wrote the blog: to help others also see the light.
Pingback: Breaking => Concerted Effort By Democrats To Eliminate Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 Of The U.S. Constitution Just Prior To Obama’s Election: Presidents To Be Natural Born Citizens! | Political Vel Craft
First of all, I did not bring up the layering issue. That broke in WorldNetDaily a few days after this column was posted. I knew that layers can exist in digital images, but I know nothing about how to examine or manipulate them. (But, I don’t think there are 50-plus. I seem to recall hearing that the maximum number of layers is 26.)
Secondly, given that I didn’t mention the layers, why would you tell me to “forget” them??
Pingback: Democrats Mounted Concerted Effort To Eliminate ‘Natural Born’ Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5: Of The U.S. Constitution Just Prior To Obama’s Election! | Political Vel Craft